Britain’s number one quality newspaper website. Oh really?

UPDATE 31 JAN: I have now added some Hitwise data which shows that even by this metric, if you combine our jobs data with the core site (and why wouldn’t you?) - the Telegraph is no longer number 1.

First, apologies for the web-metric-fest that follows. The truth is I am something of a web metrics nerd. It’s not something I ever planned, and it’s not simply part of my slightly geekish tendencies. Given the enormity of the decisions we all have to make at the moment - and the leaps we are often asking advertisers to make, transparent, accurate and well understood metrics are absolutely critical, and all of us in the market have to be very careful about what we use.

Given this, and after a decade of looking at stats in our market, imagine my surprise when I saw a poster campaign from The Telegraph announcing they were the most visited UK quality newspaper website - based (as it explains in the teeny weeny small print barely visible on a 48-sheet poster) on some Hitwise stats for Jul - Sep 06. And their site now carries the legend ‘Britain’s number one quality newspaper website’).

Initially, I thought this was just a marketing wheeze - just to put themselves back in the frame. But word gets back that they really believe it. There has been a complaint to the ASA (not from me, I should add), and ultimately it will be their call whether this is legal honest and decent etc. But, in the meantime, I think it probably makes most sense to have a look at the figures in a bit of detail here and let people make their own mind up.

And yes before I get going, the big question is does it matter anyway? But I’ll get to that at the end.

View 1: Nielsen NetRatings

Given the fact that we don’t all audit our UK users every month (see below) the best way to get comparative data is to go to Nielsen, Comscore of Hitwise. There is plenty written on the difference between them (user centric vs network centric if you’re inerested). My personal view is that the absolute numbers from all these services are less than the sense of proportion and general trends they show in the market. So, let’s see what they say.

We are not a Nielsen client, so thank you to a kind friend for providing me with this. But this is their view of UK reach among the main newspaper sites.

Neilsenstats

Which I think gives a slightly different picture. In fact, the sense of proportion between us is pretty much much the picture that anyone who operates in this market (including I expect News International) knows to be true. But Nielsen might be flawed. So let’s take another view.

View 2: Comscore

Now we are a Comscore client - frankly because we feel their panel has both the right scale (around 29,000) and takes the most scrupulous approach to weighting (in other words to ensure that their data is representative of the audience as a whole, rather than simply aggregating ISP data as Hitwise does). Again, they focus only on UK users (for the purpose of this chart anyway), and importantly they have very good penetration with ad agencies.. So let’s take a slightly longer view of what’s happening in our market.

Comscore

OK. so this goes back to June 05. And what does it show? Well yes, we’re still quite some way ahead although the Sun over took us briefly in June (World Cup? Big Brother?). The Times has shown steady growth. And the Telegraph? Well, their UK reach has actually gone down quite steadily since March 06.

Now, we can debate the comparative figures and methodologies between Nielsen/ Comscore and Hitwise etc till the cows come home. But I think that if we’re talking about the proportion of audience (and let’s not forget that is the most important thing in normal matters), again, the general order is ourselves, The Times/ Sun (they can argue that one out inside News International), and then The Telegraph.

View 3: The ABCe

But what about the ABC, I hear you ask? Well this is going to be a little trickier - partly because the Telegraph doesn’t get an audit every month. And also because at the moment, no-one gets their UK audience or traffic broken out from the total in their audit.

Now, I’ll show you what we publicly state about UK/ international audience in a minute - but it’s probably worth going through the audits in a bit of detail to see what they show us.

Monthly unique users


Monthlyuniques

First the long term view on unique users. (We only started auditing them monthly in the middle of last year) Well, when the Telegraph last got an audit they were up to around 6m, about 2m behind the Times and at about half of Guardian Unlimited.

Monthly page impressions


Monthlypages

Yes, yes - the page impression is dead. But it provides a sanity check against the user figures. Perhaps we have all those users, but The Telegraph has a smaller much more loyal gang. Well, it’s quite hard to read this one, as the Telegraph reports too infrequently for Excel to draw a line, but the answer seems to be not. It shows that the Times and Telegraph are both hovering at around 60m page impressions, again, about half of Guardian Unlimited. Interesting that their users have gone up, but traffic has stayed flat.

Daily unique users


Dailyuniques

I’ve included this because it’s an often ignored part of the ABCe certificate. What if the Telegraph actually had more people coming in every day, but a very low churn rate (ie the same 6m) while the Guardian and/ or Times had a relatively low number each day, but very high churn (ie a completely different 400,000 every day for 30 days). Well, actually that’s not the case. Yes, on a good Sunday the Times might beat us - but on the whole the spread of users throughout the month is consistent .

Actually, I think we should be using these figures much more often. For the record, the average daily user figures (perhaps the closest we can get to a print ABC) are:

Guardian 750,794
Times 476,255
Telegraph 350,536

Obviously, you might want to check those figures as a proportion of newspaper ABC to see how effectively a brand has projected itself online. But, that’s for another time.

But what about the UK?

OK - so, on our advertising information site, we break out both our UK traffic and users - they are as follows for Dec 06 (and let’s remember Dec is never a great month).

Total traffic 116,430,102
UK Traffic: 49,060,020
Total Users: 13,168,126
UK Users 4,206,160

Yes, the sharp eyed among you will notice that the UK numbers aren’t audited - but frankly these days the %age difference between our internal stats and final audit tends to be within a fraction of a %age point, so they are there or there abouts.

Perhaps the Telegraph does the same? Tragically not - in fact their ad site is a little too out of date to be of much use in this (strangely, their site is down as I’m typing this - but fortunately I took a screen grab last night)

Picture 6

Similarly, the Times (almost as out of date) ad site doesn’t break out their UK audience either

So let’s look at the US data

So, if there was someway that the Telegraph had more UK visitors than us, one way to check would be to see that they have an exceptionally low volume of US audience and therefore a disproportionately high (ie 80% plus) UK audience. Now, if only there was an easy way to look at this. Oh, did I hear someone mention Quantcast? This compares the Guardian, Times and Telegraph with the NYTimes and LATimes (partly to sanity check, partly to adjust the scale and avoid this mess)

Quantcast
Well, looking at this table of activity over the last year and looking at our individual pages (Guardian , Times, Telegraph ) it seems our US audience is pretty much in proportion with overall activity - in fact, some days the Times beats us and yes, the Telegraph isn’t that far off on some days. So - lacking in US audience they certainly are not.

The wrong type of users?

Ah yes, but perhaps we should be talking about quality, rather than quantity of users. OK, so why don’t we look at Forrester’s survey of Affluent internet consumers from September 2006.

Picture 9

This shows two things - first the top newspapers read by these affluent online consumers, and next the websites they use. Perhaps things have changed since September 2006 - but as this falls into the same period that the Telegraph were promoting in their advertising, it is still relevant to our overall story.

So what about the Hitwise stats and that number one claim?

So, let’s get down to the data in question. This measures proportion of visits - not the number of users. Having seen the table (I am waiting for another friend to provide one I can put up here) yes, The Telegraph did come at the top of the list, although The Guardian site on hitwise is broken into bits (Jobs gets a different line, for example - while the Telegraph is all bundled together), put all our stuff together and I suspect the lead is marginal at best . and you find that the Telegraph is no longer number one. Their share is 5.23% while ours is 5.7%. This is for a different period (30 days to 20/1/07) - but a) it was the true story while the posters were running and b) I doubt there is that much of an overall shift in trend between periods.

But more importantly, I think that if you look at the stats provided above, they’re probably taking things just a teeny bit too far to start calling themselves the UK’s number one quality newspaper website. On any front.

I should add - I don’t think we have any God-given right to being number one for ever. I know that everyone within Guardian Unlimited is all too aware of that - and we continue to improve and innovate: editorially, technically and commercially. Maybe the Telegraph will fly past us and the Times. Maybe the Times will rocket ahead. But not if we can prevent it. And the data shows no sign that it has happened yet.

So what?

So what indeed, I hear you ask. Well, some general points.

1. In the grand scheme of things it doesn’t matter
Actually, while there’s nothing the UK newspaper market likes more than a good old scrap, this sort of tussle between old enemies is sort of irrelevant in this new media landscape. First because advertisers buy campaigns - not the entire audited audience. But Second and more important, because we are all much smaller fish in a much bigger ocean. Two things I think will really matter.
* Putting in place the strategies to start to see the sort of growth levels being experience by non-newspaper sites
* Genuine understanding of the unique nature of our audiences - across print, online and whatever other media we inhabit in the future.
* Offering smart commercial solutions that make the best use of all available channels.

2. Auditing less than monthly is shocking
I don’t think I need to go into this. I suspect the Telegraph will move to monthly audits very quickly given how seriously they now take this medium. Monthly audits will mean that we can compare independently verified stats on actual usage of our site (as opposed to panel based activity). And frankly, we should really be talking about average daily figures, not aggregate monthlies (a trend started in the early days of the web, when we needed to make our user figures seem big enough within our organisations).

3. UK figures need to be broken out
Why not? Surely no-one’s hiding anything. Basically I don’t think anyone can disagree with the fact that more transparency should be a good thing. I look forward to both the Times and Telegraph telling us regularly how much of their traffic and user base is from the UK.

4. As an industry, we’ve agreed on users. Let’s stick with it.
There is little that’s perfect about measuring Unique Users. It’s not the same as people. But we have all (including the Telegraph, indirectly) agreed through Jicwebs that audited unique users are the way forward. At least it is consistent and frankly, our industry looks a shambles if we keep hopping from one metric to the other just because it suits us.

Perhaps we should start shouting about the fact that we have (at the time of writing) some 32,000 inbound links to our blogs compared to the 5,000 for the Telegraph’s. But no, that would be too petty by half.

Anyway - if you’ve made it this far well done. I will go back to blogging about rural life in Surrey very shortly.

Comments (113) to “Britain’s number one quality newspaper website. Oh really?”

  1. For me, the interesting thing about this Telegraph campaign is not so much the - indeed questionable - traffic claims but the fact that on the tube about one ad in three (no science behind that at all, just my impression) is for their downloadable PDF newspaper. There’s a fair few print-your-own newspapers about, but it’s not something I’m aware of anyone else in the world actually taking out ad space to promote.

  2. […] Waldo looks into the Telegraph’s frankly silly “Britain’s Number One Quality Website” claim: “The truth is I am something of a web metrics nerd… given the enormity of the decisions we all have to make at the moment - and the leaps we are often asking advertisers to make, transparent, accurate and well understood metrics are absolutely critical, and all of us in the market have to be very careful about what we use.” […]

  3. […] Today Simon Waldman, director of digital strategy at Guardian Media Group, could no longer contain himself. He has weighed in with a long, detailed post on his blog explaining the competing web metrics available, and why he feels these suggest that the Telegraph’s claim is bunk. […]

  4. Telegraph net ad debunked by real figures…

    I don’t wish to be parti pris so I’ve held off from mentioning the poster campaign by the Telegraph group which lays claim to Telegraph.co.uk being “Britain’s number one quality newspaper website” when, plainly, it is not. Each time I……

  5. […] Simon Waldman: Britain’s number one quality newspaper website. Oh really? Guardian Media Group’s Simon Waldman has weighed into the simmering dispute about the Telegraph’s Hitwise-based claim to be Britain’s “Number 1 quality newspaper web site”. (tags: telegraph online newspapers guardian times bbc hitwise comscore nielson abce metrics) […]

  6. […] Britain’s number one quality newspaper website. Oh really? at SimonWaldman.net (tags: metrics hitwise media+planning online+newspapers) […]

  7. Obviously further proof is unnecessary, but the somewhat dubious stats from Alexa and Compete (US only) tell the same story. Slightly more interesting (at least to those of us who see directly the impact that Google News can have on traffic) are the stats from Private Radio and NewsKnife which show that the most prominent sites on Google News also happen to be those with the highest traffic.

  8. […] Britain’s number one quality newspaper website. Oh really? at SimonWaldman.net Simon gets biblical on the Telegraph’s claim to be “the number one quality newspaper website” - quite rightly by the looks of it. A very good 101 in newspaper stats and what those guys care about. (tags: newspapers guardian telegraph stats) […]

  9. […] Original post by simon.waldman and software by Elliott Back […]

  10. […] Update: Seamus makes a very good observation about the blogroll: Odd to think that Lloyd Shepherd and Simon Waldman, both of whom would surely have been a shoe-in less than a year ago, didn’t make the list - presumably because Lloyd wrapped up his blog mid 2006 and Simon posts very rarely these days (though when he does, it’s a real doozy). […]

  11. […] To me the most interesting part of the story is Simon Waldman’s (of the Guardian) gallery of analytics from Nielsen/NetRatings, Comscore, ABCe, Quantcast, Forrester and Hitwise (what, no Alexa numbers?) to prove why Guadian is the number one “quality” newspaper website in Britain. […]

  12. So Simon why don’t all major UK online publishers get an ABCe audit specifically for UK users - it would seem to make good sense. We’ve just done our first audit in a while (Dec 06) and specifically requested a geographical breakdown so we can have absolute clarity with our advertisers around the world. Cricinfo is of course slightly different as we target a number of major markets in advertising terms, but the principle stands.

  13. Ah - you miss the point. It is ALL rubbish! First, Mr Waldman, read this article on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_visitor

    There is no way you can really tell how many visitors you have accurately, though if you have a result of 2 on one day and 30,000 on the next day you could safely say you had got more popular - but little more than that!

    As for the various research companies, I find I am highly suspicious of them. The problem with the web is that the whole way it works is dynamic and, well, web like! That means that there is almost limitless ways a person can end up reading something from any particular site. So much so, that you may not even be aware of the origin of the information you are reading. This makes any true analysis a very in exact science - though the companies that are making a fortune out of this data are hardly going to admit any of this!

    When it comes to this being reported to the ASA, is is debatable how many teeth the ASA really have for stuff said on the web. I would think it would be as hard for them to prove the telegraphs claim as wrong as it would be for the telegraph to claim it is right.

    It is all a matter of perspective. How many products (particularly hair products) have you seen advertised on television recently that say they are the “Product of the Year?” All they need to do is ask people to vote for them as the product of the year on a website and that is it. They don’t, legally speaking, need to have alternatives to vote for, you either vote or don’t vote. It is amazing how many people who given a button to interact with will automatically press it!

  14. “Given the enormity of the decisions….” ? There’s nothing wrong with being a webstats nerd or inded a pedant, so long as you also have a dictionary. It is possible you meant “importance”.

  15. Cedric… inded…you are right..

  16. […] And based on this data…which title would you say is Britain’s number one quality newspaper website? Of course.. […]

  17. […] I think this is the kind of area and analysis that Hitwise, who do plenty of good work, fall down on. Or more accurately, I suppose, those who run with the data end up getting it wrong (at this point, of course, I’m bound to mention the Telegraph’s “No1 website” claim and the Guardian’s willy-waving today). […]

  18. i think that britian is great 1 i hope my childrens children see how beautiful it is and how nice the people are ! so why worry so much if u love britain? if u love it as much as i do then u should know that evrything would be all right!

  19. i think that britian is great 1 i hope my childrens children see how beautiful it is and how nice the people are ! so why worry so much if u love britain? if u love it as much as i do then u should know that evrything would be all right!

  20. Torygraph goes up to 11…

    Independent - Telegraph.co.uk’s web surge ignites row Guardian - Publishers query Telegraph rise Telegraph - We’re No. 1! We’re No. 1!* (*OK, so I’m paraphrasing.) Eyebrows raised in the past by the Telegraph’s past traffic claims here and here. T…

  21. Worldwide client base in the mobile communications space. See the details at
    www.icoft.com/roke.html
    any clarification at
    icoft123@gmail.co

  22. Simon Waldman : Britain’s number one quality news paper. Is very informative, used by all the readers. Its very helpfull to collect all the informations.
    ——————–
    Ariana
    MLS

  23. India-born entrepreneurs empower US voters

    Shukoor Ahmed ran for a seat in the Maryland House of Delegates in 1998, after coming to America a decade earlier from Hyderabad, India. Campaigning door-to-door, he was surprised so many voters did not know who represented them!

    After his race ended slightly short of victory, he took advantage of his Master’s degree in Computer Technology and Political Science to build StateDemocracy.org, a website he launched in 2001 to connect citizens and lawmakers. His website’s motto encapsulated its mission:

  24. The warm feeling I get when someone is thoughtful enough to say thank you for having been helped far outweighs the empty one I get when there’s no feedback at all.

  25. I love to read interesting post that has knowledge to impart regarding current issues! Thank you for sharing your insights! I will avidly wait for your next blog entry.

  26. I really love read blogs that contain very good information about any shoes or fashion! Thanks for sharing such information and I also want to share some information about the Fly London Shoes at the site listed below
    http://www.treds.co.uk/manufacturer/fly/39/1
    I really wait for the next blog entry.

  27. Thanks for sharing this information.

  28. Useful information. You have done an impressive post. Newspapers should be still in front of internet. But sadly it is not that way.

  29. Nice blog.We are engaged in a similar job.If there have an opportunity,we can have an furthur Exchanges and cooperation.Let’s keep in touch.Looking forward to your reply.

  30. Nice blog.Now,from your blog,I know what should i do. thanks.

  31. thank you fro share “ flying shoes

  32. love to read interesting post that has knowledge to impart regarding current issues! Thank you for sharing your insights! I will avidly wait.

  33. Useful information. You have done an impressive post. Newspapers should be still in front of internet. But sadly it is not that way.

  34. Thank you canım.

  35. Useful information. Thank you very much…

  36. Thank you very much :) )

  37. deeply felt.thanks for your share.hehe

  38. The content of your blog is exactly what I needed, I like your blog, I sincerely hope that your blog a rapid increase in traffic density, which help promote your blog and we hope that your blog is being updated and placed can always be richer and more colorful.

  39. thanks for share.
    very useful information…

  40. Thanks a lot for reviewing..

  41. I would like to propose not to wait until you get big sum of money to buy different goods! You can get the home loans or bank loan and feel yourself fine

  42. It’s so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow if your blog can offer rrs subscription service.

  43. Wow amazing! Your blog is my absolute favorite on the internet! Thanks again for a nice site.

  44. To your blog! Your article makes me feeling very much! Thank you! Wish you good luck!

  45. Best blog post title of the year.Great comments all around. I like how there are a variety voices coming through.

  46. We — the news industry — have come to that fork in the road. We must take bold, decisive steps to secure the audiences and funding to support journalism’s essential role in both our economy and democracy, or find ourselves on an ugly path to obscurity.

  47. I really like your blog, I feel we have a common love from your blog. Hope you make friends with me, and give more exchanges later. I have a website about shoes [url=” http://www.airjordans.cc /”] [/url] , you can have a look.

  48. Great post! very well written, keep up the good work! Greetings

  49. ooo good analystic

  50. I’m very much a hands vis a photo of this very reason, I prefer the sketches are drawn. we are constantly out rarely, if ever, will reach new creative space available photographs’ be pictures of the new.thanks..

  51. Looking to wear something exciting in your feet, roxy sandals uk is a perfect match! rosy sandals add a cool spunk to tReds collection with its coloful, stylish, funky, sporty and durable shoes.

  52. Valuable information and excellent design you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up

  53. Adhering to your remarkable writings, I get hold of the idea is actually of the extraordinary theme and also successful tips.Suppose which I may undoubtedly attain exactly what specifically I learn through your views.Thanks a lot!

  54. Adhering to your remarkable writings, I get hold of the idea is actually of the extraordinary theme and also successful tips.Suppose which I may undoubtedly attain exactly what specifically I learn through your views.Thanks a lot!

  55. google maps ve yorumlar iyi bir sıralama site, ama biz daha iyi size .. teşekkür tanıtmak istiyorum

  56. ooo good analystic

  57. veryy godddd

  58. I’m very much a hands vis a photo of this very reason, I prefer the sketches are drawn. we are constantly out rarely, if ever, will reach new creative space available photographs’ be pictures of the new.thanks..

  59. I’m very much a hands vis a photo of this very reason,I prefer the sketches are drawn. we are constantly out rarely, if ever, will reach new creative space available photographs’ be pictures of the new.thanks..

  60. are youu veryy

  61. Best blog post title of the year.Great comments all around. I like how there are a variety voices coming through.

  62. Beautiful blog with great informational content. I have know a lot about this news ! TKS !

  63. It’s great to hear from you and see what you’ve been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.

  64. teşekkürler admin….

  65. harikasın admin…

  66. nice thanx a lot

  67. Hello everyone.
    In our online shop, you can purchase different designer mbt shoes, and we offer the commodities are high in quality and reasonable at price now.
    These are our mbt shoes on sale.
    Shop’s homepage www.mbtshoeshop-online.com
    walking shoes
    comfort shoes
    mbt shoes

  68. ooo good news

  69. Nice News, really great, greetings from Kinderbücher.

  70. I have read a number of posts of yours, but this is the one that I like the most. So expecting some more ideas from your side. Thanks

  71. Your smile is so brilliant, every one has a dream, we believe if we work hard, we can come true our dream. Come on! I am looking forward your reply at Cheap Watches

  72. Nice News, really great, greetings from good

  73. Nice News, really great, greetings from good

  74. Great Say. Thanks.

  75. It’s so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow.
    http://www.mbtshoes2your.com/

  76. It’s so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow.
    http://mbtshoes2your.com/mbt-kisumu-2-white-sandals-for-menwomen-p-126.html

  77. Thanks for that analysis!

  78. The event is said to have been such as was desired, the pacification and diversion of all to whom it related, except Sir George Dunk SBBrown, who complained with some bitterness that, in the character of Sir Plume, he was made to talk nonsense. Whether all this be true I have some doubt; for at Paris, a few years ago, a niece of Mrs. Fermor, who Womens Nike Dunkpresided in an English convent, mentioned Pope’s work with very little gratitude, rather as an insult than an honour; and she may be supposed to have inherited the opinion of her family. At its first appearance at was termed by Addison “merum Buy Nike Dunk sal.” Pope, however, saw that it was capable of improvement; and, having luckily contrived to borrow his machinery from the Rosicrucians, imparted the scheme with which his head was teeming to Addison, who told him that his Cheap Nike Dunkswork, as it stood, was “a delicious little thing,” and gave him no encouragement to retouch it. This has been too hastily considered as an instance of Addison’s jealousy, for, as he could not guess the conduct of the new design, or the possibilities of pleasure Cheap Nike Dunkcomprised in a fiction of which there had been no examples, he might very reasonably and kindly persuade the author to acquiesce in his own prosperity, and forbear an attempt which he considered as an unnecessary hazard. Addison’s counsel was happily rejected. Pope foresaw the future efflorescence of imagery then Nike Dunksbudding in his mind, and resolved to spare no art or industry of cultivation. The soft luxuriance of his fancy was already shooting, and all the gay varieties of diction were ready at his hand to colour and embellish it. His attempt was justified by its success. The “Rape of the Lock” stands forward, in the classes of literature, as the most exquisite example of ludicrous poetry.

  79. Thanks for that analysis!

  80. Rather appreciate your material, my beneficial fortune to explore your webpage.

  81. I have read a number of posts of yours, but this is the one that I like the most

  82. MBT shoes had been popular all over the world,about 100 million pairs needed every year. MBT shoes has many kinds,suah as MBT Changa shoes,MBT Chapa GTX,MBT Fanaka GTX ,MBT Lami shoes , MBT M.WALK,MBTShuguli,MBT Sports shoes,MBT Tariki ,MBT Tunisha shoes ,MBT Voi。All MBt shoes are good for your health.It is your best choice.For more information,pls visit http://www.trade161.com

  83. good blog good post

  84. In IE7, I notice the “project details” part overlaps for a short period from one tab to the next. It’s smoother

  85. Intimately, the post is actually the best on this laudable topic. I harmonize with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your future updates. Saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the fantastic lucidity in your writing.

  86. I loved the article. It is very exciting. Thank you for the information. I will be back.

  87. Do you want to become the beautiful scenery this summer? or do you want to attract eyeball among the crowd?now,listen carefully,your wishes will come true here .we support all different kinds of beautiful leisure production,such as sunglasses,t-shiirts and swim trunks et.from here,you will find your favorite things.What are you waiting for?go and choose the now!

  88. we are professional sell Air Jordan Shoes.our company website have Retro Jordaneach products prices,each products is top quality.We have the following advantages:1.Top quality and guaranteethe return problem goods. we only sell airjordans and just offer top quality!also we can guaranteethe products qualtiy,if have any quality problem then you can return the goods or money!2.Free door to door ship goods.each products is free ship by EMS to you.when you made payment then will send out the goods without 24hours!!3.feat prices. We can give you the feat price is 50% of market prices.4.accept paypal payment.we also can accept western union payment and will down 5% total prices for use western union.5.after service.if you have any problem about the goods or want need othe products we will glad serve for you!Please visit our website http://www.airjordanshoes.cc/ and obtain more information!I believe you will find your need the products.Air Jordan Women

  89. Every girl will be happy with inspired links of London jewelry which make her look dazzling and outstanding; every girl will be happier to obtain brand jewelry with less money which makes them a sense of achievement. That’s why girls all like links jewelry where various links of London jewelries are at most keen prices
    click http://www.linksjewelry.co.uk/Charms/ get more information

  90. thanks

  91. In IE7, I notice the “project details” part overlaps for a short period from one tab to the next. It’s smoother

  92. I think it probably makes most sense to have a look at the figures in a bit of detail here and let people make their own mind up

  93. Good article, i like the webdesign of your blog too.

  94. i love this site wonderfull article very thanks …

  95. thnk you for sharing

  96. Afghans to Form Local Forces to Fight Taliban 传奇私服
    Chinese Preachers Bridge Indonesia’s Ethnic Gap 传奇私服
    Federal Oversight for Troubled N.Y. Youth Prisons 传奇sf

  97. wonderfull article very thanks

  98. hey,you have posted such a effectful article that it will certainly help me.
    i love NFL so much,it’s so great,this summer,i prepare a gift for myself,best Minnesota Vikings jerseys to support my best stars!

  99. his site and the admin most heartfelt thanks to all the friends say

  100. site is perfect

  101. Block may very beautiful. Information is very helpful, thank you

  102. Very nice sharing. Thank you… Good information and good way your blog post. Good luck blogger man.

  103. Thanks for that analysis!

  104. Block may very beautiful. Information is very helpful, thank you

  105. wonderfull article very thanks
    Bayan Giyim
    http://www.carmenstore.com

  106. hey,you have posted such a effectful article that it will certainly help me.

  107. Abundance is a life cheap nike jordan on sale style, a way of living your life. It isnt something jordan shoes eleven you buy now and then or pull down from the official nike jordan shoes cupboard, dust off and use once or twice.

  108. Sony is apparently reaching out to select developers and publishers to get some early software coming.

  109. great blog!

  110. We wholesale hats at competitive price,providing a huge range of hats with different brand name,such as coogi hats, polo hats,Jordan hats,red bull hats,famous hats,dc shoes hats,new era MLB hats, etc.You can buy cheap hats. Welcome to visist here.
    From: http://www.newera-caps.net

  111. I really liked your article. Keep up the good work.
    I love flowers…I am also interested to send flowers all over the world….

  112. Thank You.

  113. Thank You.

Post a Comment
*Required
*Required (Never published)